Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages
flat view
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Date: 2026-09-29 08:36:32
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-mm, lkml
On Sep 29, 2026, at 15:36, David Hildenbrand (Arm) [off-list ref] wrote: On 9/27/26 04:54, Muchun Song wrote:quoted
HugeTLB vmemmap optimization now uses per-zone shared tail vmemmap pages. Device DAX has not been switched to that mechanism yet. Switch device DAX to vmemmap_shared_tail_page() as well. This aligns DAX with HugeTLB by using the common per-zone shared tail vmemmap page. The optimization is enabled only for DEV-DAX through pgmap->vmemmap_shift, which supplies the compound page order recorded in section metadata before vmemmap population. Unlike FS-DAX, DEV-DAX does not modify tail struct pages, so sharing them is safe. Since the shared tail page can now back ZONE_DEVICE vmemmap mappings, initialize its entries with PG_reserved for device zones. Also skip poisoning vmemmap-optimizable sections while their struct pages may be shared. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <redacted> Acked-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev> --- v3: - Move device_zone() after the definition of NODE_DATA() to fix non-NUMA builds. - Update the commit message to describe the compound page order stored in section metadata - Collect Acked-by from Qi Zheng v2: - Explain why sharing tail vmemmap pages is safe for DEV-DAX (suggested by Qi Zheng) ---[...]quoted
- static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,@@ -551,21 +536,18 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,pte_t *pte; int rc; unsigned long flags = VMEMMAP_POPULATE_DAX; + struct page *page; + unsigned int order = pfn_to_section_compound_order(start_pfn);const and all the way to the top.
OK.
I did wonder about the poisoning change ... because the memmap usually gets initialized once the memory section gets moved to a zone. SO now I'm a bit confused about the ordering of events :)
Yes, the normal memmap entries are initialized later when the range is moved into the zone. The shared tail entries are the exception, though. The ordering for device DAX is: 1. sparse_add_section() sets the section compound order and populates the vmemmap. 2. During vmemmap population, optimizable tail entries are mapped to the per-zone shared tail page, which is initialized by vmemmap_shared_tail_page(). 3. page_init_poison() is reached after that population. 4. Later, move_pfn_range_to_zone() calls memmap_init_range(), but the latter deliberately skips vmemmap_optimizable_pfn() because those entries have already been initialized. Therefore, an unconditional poison here would overwrite the initialized shared tail page, and the later zone initialization would not restore it. The non-shared entries are still initialized later as usual. I agree that this ordering is not obvious. I will update the comment to make it clearer, for example: /* * Poison uninitialized struct pages to catch invalid flag combinations. * * Tail struct pages in a vmemmap-optimized section are initialized and * shared during vmemmap population, so they must not be overwritten here. */ Thanks, Muchun
-- Cheers, David