On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 3:36 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
On 11/08/2026 09:33, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Why mentioning upstream in the first place? Either this change breaks
ABI or not, explain that.
The deprecated 'port' property is retained, so this change is fully backwards
compatible and does not break ABI.
So why? Drop redundant parts.
Ok, I will remove the sentence below in the commit message.
No existing upstream DTS file for fsl,imx-asrc uses the previously
documented single 'port' node, so this change does not break any
in-tree device tree.
Honestly, it's redundant, because you are not dropping it. So even if
DTS was using the port, what would change?
Understood. Even if a DTS was using 'port', nothing would change since
'port' is retained. I will drop the sentence in v4.
Thanks.
Best regards
Shengjiu Wang