Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: reduce mmap_lock contention and improve page fault performance
From: Hongru Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-23 07:58:56
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, lkml, loongarch
On 5/20/26 23:15, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 05:14:20AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:quoted
My understanding is that we should not blame applications here. This is 2026: there are basically only two kinds of applications ��� single-threaded and multi-threaded ��� and single-threaded applications are nearly extinct.all of the applications i run are either single threaded or don't fork. what multithreaded applications call fork?Traditionally the problem was random libraries using fork+execve to launch other programs ... instead of using alternatives like posix_spwan (some use cases require more work done before execve and cannot yet switch to that). I'd hope that that is less of a problem on Android. I assume Android zygote might be multi threaded? Maybe sshd as well? Systemd? But I'd be surprised if there are really performance implications. Not sure about webbroswers .... I think most of them switched to fork servers, where I would assume fork servers would be single-threaded. So, yeah, getting a clear understanding how this ends up being a problem on Android would be great.
Barry asked me to share observations on fork() usage across Android applications. I wrote a BPF-based tracing tool (kprobe on copy_process, checking CLONE_VM to distinguish process creation from thread creation) and ran it against the top 200 Android applications in the China market during normal usage scenarios. Results: - 82 out of 200 apps (41%) call fork() during normal operation - Among these, some call fork() from multiple threads These are not zygote forks ��� they are fork() calls initiated by app threads at runtime. Examples by category: Browsers: com.quark.browser, com.UCMobile, com.xunlei.browser Shopping: com.taobao.taobao, com.tmall.wireless, com.achievo.vipshop Video: com.youku.phone, com.qiyi.video, com.hunantv.imgo.activity Social/IM: com.alibaba.android.rimet, com.ss.android.lark News: com.ss.android.article.news, com.ss.android.article.lite Navigation: com.autonavi.minimap, com.sdu.didi.psnger Finance: com.eg.android.AlipayGphone, com.chinamworld.main This confirms that fork() is widely used in real-world multi-threaded Android applications. Since dup_mmap() needs to acquire vma_start_write() for every VMA, holding the VMA lock across I/O would risk blocking fork() for unpredictable durations in these 82 applications. Tracing tool (two equivalent implementations): bpftrace: https://gist.github.com/zhr250/bf4384202d598bb4cda71cb9902f15ab libbpf-bootstrap: https://gist.github.com/zhr250/76189bdf51bdc8818500e4c8917c6493 Analysis results (top 200 apps): https://gist.github.com/zhr250/06f51092c84a49c602a55ac3d186e9ce Hongru