Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] appletalk: move the protocol out of tree
From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2026-06-18 00:56:01
Also in:
linux-m68k, linux-mips, netdev
From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2026-06-18 00:56:01
Also in:
linux-m68k, linux-mips, netdev
On Wed, 17 Jun 2026, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
quoted
_Someone_ has to handle the reports and patches. And since nobody is doing that the code is going to GitHub, where it can continue to "just be left" or whatever, without racking up CVEs for the Linux kernel and leading to maintainer burn out :/That's a good point. The large influx of reports is a problem, and burn out of maintainers is a too high cost.
Carsten, if, as a maintainer, you want to avoid burnout then 1) don't promise what you can't deliver (that is, decline sponsorship) 2) delegate (that is, leverage AI as an ally not as a lame excuse) So the question remains: what is it which _can_ be delivered by and for the "community" (by which I mean, that group of people which includes actual end users -- not merely paying customers and sponsored developers). This question has precious little to do with burnout, but it's the question we need to address.