On 04.06.2026 20:24, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 08:27:36PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

quoted

I already sent a v6 in the hope of getting this merged for the next
merge window. Should I send a v7, or would you prefer that I do the
rename on top of v6?

I think it is too late for such a major change, but this should be
imaginged to be for rc2ish next cycle. You also have to spell out how
the pkvm patch will get sequenced as well, it would be best to push
that it gets picked up right away.

I would like to give this a bit of time in linux-next so it is a bit too
late for v7.2, but before merging it I would also like to have this code
reviewed by someone with confidential computing knowledge.


Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland