Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options
From: Athira Rajeev <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-04 15:09:16
Also in:
linux-perf-users
On 4 Jun 2026, at 7:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [off-list ref] wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:17:58AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 02:02:53PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:quoted
quoted
On 27 Apr 2026, at 11:26 AM, Namhyung Kim [off-list ref] wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 03:09:30PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:quoted
In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test: -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output regexp parsing) This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options. # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1 This will record using perf sched record perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S" # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S -S : Captures summary also at the end # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s -s : Captures only summary The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference in these two, test fails. Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is: rcu_sched[16] 2 4 0.013 0.001 0.003 0.006 33.23 0 migration/11[73] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0 migration/3[33] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0 - :216753[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0 + sleep[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0 migration/8[58] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0 NetworkManager[811] 1 2 0.089 0.028 0.044 0.060 36.06 0 migration/13[83] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0 Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result. In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]", where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result ":216753[216753]". After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names of processes in zombie state") for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid. This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function. Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which captures summary) also will have meaningful information. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <redacted>Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Thanks, NamhyungHi, Can we please have this pulled in, if the patch looks fine ?Can you please check applying it on top of current perf-tools-next?So, this seems to be also addressed by: commit 39f473f6d0b24cf375893f2110b1cc9d8a079a42 Author: Anubhav Shelat [off-list ref] Date: Wed Jul 16 16:39:15 2025 -0400 perf sched timehist: decode process names of processes in zombie state Previously when running perf trace timehist --state, when recording processes in the zombie state the process name would not be decoded properly and appears with just the PID: 1140057.412177 [0006] Mutter Input Th[3139/3104] 0.956 0.019 0.041 S 1140057.412222 [0012] :1248612[1248612] 0.000 0.000 0.332 Z 1140057.412275 [0004] <idle> 0.052 0.052 0.953 I 1140057.412284 [0008] <idle> 0.070 0.070 0.932 I 1140057.412333 [0004] KMS thread[3126/3104] 0.953 0.112 0.058 S Now some extra processing has been added to decode the process name: 1140057.412177 [0006] Mutter Input Th[3139/3104] 0.956 0.019 0.041 S 1140057.412222 [0012] sleep[1248612] 0.000 0.000 0.332 Z 1140057.412275 [0004] <idle> 0.052 0.052 0.953 I 1140057.412284 [0008] <idle> 0.070 0.070 0.932 I 1140057.412333 [0004] KMS thread[3126/3104] 0.953 0.112 0.058 S Signed-off-by: Anubhav Shelat [off-list ref] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250716203914.45772-2-ashelat@redhat.com (local) Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim [off-list ref] No? It is not applying to perf-tools-next, a quick look found the patch above.
Hi Arnaldo
commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
of processes in zombie state”)
added change for -S option. The patch I submitted is to add change in process name for “-s” option as well
I will check applying this on top of current perf-tools-next
Thanks
Athira
- Arnaldo