On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 3:07 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

On 19/01/2026 07:27, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 7:44 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 06:16:47PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

quoted

The specific feature for AUDMIX on i.MX952 is that it can be bypassed,
so add fsl,amix-bypass property for this feature, besides this there is
no power domain defined on i.MX952, so make power-domains to be
dedicated to i.MX8QM.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,audmix.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,audmix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,audmix.yaml
index 3ad197b3c82c..50fb08460b4f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,audmix.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,audmix.yaml

@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ description: |

 properties:
   compatible:
-    const: fsl,imx8qm-audmix
+    enum:
+      - fsl,imx8qm-audmix
+      - fsl,imx952-audmix

   reg:
     maxItems: 1

@@ -75,12 +77,41 @@ properties:
         unevaluatedProperties: false
         description: Output port to SAI RX

+  fsl,amix-bypass:
+    type: boolean
+    description:
+      The audmix module is bypassed from hardware.

I don't understand why device AUDMIX would have property saying AUDMIX
(so itself) can by bypassed. If you bypass the device itself, what do
you configure here?

The case is that the SAI interface is connected to AUDMIX,  but AUDMIX can also
be bypassed by hardware configuration.

Yes, adding this property in the AUDMIX module looks strange.  Another
choice is to
add this property in the SAI binding document.  Is this better?

Not sure, but certainly it does not look like a property of AUDMIX.

I assume you acknowledge all other comments.

I will move the property to the SAI binding document, then please
have a review.  As this change, the binding document will be updated, for
the comments to use the example-schema (:false) will be adopted if needed.

Thanks.

Best regards
Shengjiu Wang

Best regards,
Krzysztof