On Sat 2025-12-27 09:16:08, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The current usage of console_is_usable() is clumsy. The parameter
@use_atomic is boolean and thus not self-explanatory. The function is
called twice in situations when there are no-strict requirements.
Replace it with enum nbcon_write_cb which provides a more descriptive
values for all 3 situations: atomic, thread or any.
Note that console_is_usable() checks only NBCON_USE_ATOMIC because
.write_thread() callback is mandatory. But the other two values still
make sense because they describe the intention of the caller.
--- a/include/linux/console.h
+++ b/include/linux/console.h
@@ -202,6 +202,19 @@ enum cons_flags {
CON_NBCON_ATOMIC_UNSAFE = BIT(9),
};
+/**
+ * enum nbcon_write_cb - Defines which nbcon write() callback must be used based
+ * on the caller context.
+ * @NBCON_USE_ATOMIC: Use con->write_atomic().
+ * @NBCON_USE_THREAD: Use con->write_thread().
+ * @NBCON_USE_ANY: The caller does not have any strict requirements.
+ */
+enum nbcon_write_cb {
+ NBCON_USE_ATOMIC,
+ NBCON_USE_THREAD,
+ NBCON_USE_ANY,
AFAIK, this would define NBCON_USE_ATOMIC as zero. See below.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+};
+
/**
* struct nbcon_state - console state for nbcon consoles
* @atom: Compound of the state fields for atomic operations
@@ -622,7 +635,8 @@ extern void nbcon_kdb_release(struct nbcon_write_context *wctxt);
* which can also play a role in deciding if @con can be used to print
* records.
*/
-static inline bool console_is_usable(struct console *con, short flags, bool use_atomic)
+static inline bool console_is_usable(struct console *con, short flags,
+ enum nbcon_write_cb nwc)
{
if (!(flags & CON_ENABLED))
return false;@@ -631,7 +645,7 @@ static inline bool console_is_usable(struct console *con, short flags, bool use_
return false;
if (flags & CON_NBCON) {
- if (use_atomic) {
+ if (nwc & NBCON_USE_ATOMIC) {
This will always be false because NBCON_USE_ATOMIC is zero.
I think that it was defined as "0x1" in the original proposal.
Let's keep it defined by as zero and use here:
if (nwc == NBCON_USE_ATOMIC) {
Note that we do _not_ want to return "false" for "NBCON_USE_ANY"
when con->write_atomic does not exist.
/* The write_atomic() callback is optional. */
if (!con->write_atomic)
return false;
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
Best Regards,
Petr