Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 8 authors, 2026-01-08

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: remove support for highmem on VIVT

From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2026-01-02 12:12:55
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm

On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:26:12PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 09:34:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025, at 18:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
 arch/arm/Kconfig                    |  1 +
 arch/arm/configs/gemini_defconfig   |  1 -
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig |  1 -
 arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v5_defconfig |  1 -
 arch/arm/include/asm/highmem.h      | 56 ++---------------------------
 arch/arm/mm/cache-feroceon-l2.c     | 31 ++--------------
 arch/arm/mm/cache-xsc3l2.c          | 47 +++---------------------
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c           | 12 ++-----
 arch/arm/mm/flush.c                 | 19 +++-------
 9 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
This looks great, but do you think there should be a boot time crash
if a VIVT and HIGHMEM are enabled, just incase?
Do you mean in the common code or just for Arm?

We could use the Arm specific cache_is_vivt() macro, but it feels like
the 'dpends on !CPU_CACHE_VIVT' Kconfig check I added is both
safer and simpler.
Okay, so maybe I'm asking if !CPU_CACHE_VIVT then the kernel fails to
boot on vivt systems, maybe it already does?
The cache modes (CPU_CACHE_xxx) are (were) selected by the processor
config entries. Not having the correct processor support built in to
the kernel will cause a boot failure.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help