Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2025-09-08

Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: introduce local state for lazy_mmu sections

From: Lorenzo Stoakes <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-05 11:38:35
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
You should really base on mm-new.

You need to account for everything that is potentially going to go
upstream. mm-stable is generally not actually populated all too well until
shortly before merge window anyway.
Just to note that mm-unstable is also fine. Despite its name, it's substantially
more stable than mm-new, which can even break the build and appears to have no
checks performed on it at all.

But mm-new is the most uptodate version of all the mm code.

Thanks, Lorenzo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help