Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits
flat view
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Date: 2025-09-01 04:50:35
Also in:
linux-s390, lkml
On 8/26/2025 2:57 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h index 86de4d0dd0aa..9a320d96e891 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h@@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)} #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC extern const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu); +#endifIs ifdef necessary here?
This is gone in Peter's squash but I added it just to remain consistent with cpu_smt_mask() above.
quoted
/* Since OpenPIC has only 4 IPIs, we use slightly different message numbers. *diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c index e623f2864dc4..7f79b853b221 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c@@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ static bool has_coregroup_support(void)return coregroup_enabled; } +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu) { if (has_coregroup_support())@@ -1071,6 +1072,7 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpu_mc_mask(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,{ return cpu_corgrp_mask(cpu); } +#endifPrevious patch says cpu_coregroup_mask is exported. Is it exported in any way to user or modules?
Just "exposed" to kernel/sched/topology.c bits :) I don't think this is used by any generic module / exported to userspace.
Also i don't see similar gating in other archs. It maybe unnecessary.quoted
static const struct cpumask *cpu_pkg_mask(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu) {@@ -1729,10 +1731,12 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)SDTL_INIT(shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, CACHE); } +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC if (has_coregroup_support()) { powerpc_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_mc_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, MC); } +#endifJust this gating should suffice IMO.
Ack. Your suggested diff to have CONFIG_SCHED_MC configurable on powerpc looks good. -- Thanks and Regards, Prateek