Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-01

Re: [PATCH v2] integrity: Extract secure boot enquiry function out of IMA

From: GONG Ruiqi <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-03 05:19:31
Also in: keyrings, linux-integrity, linux-s390, lkml

On 7/3/2025 11:35 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
...
quoted
You're right. I didn't realize it's arch-specific in the first place,
and moving and renaming arch_ima_get_secureboot() turned out to be a
real mess ...

So the V3 keeps the prototype of arch_ima_get_secureboot(), and only
moves out its body, which I think can also better represent the
intention of the patch.
It's definitely much better.  To summarize, arch_ima_get_secureboot() becomes a
wrapper for integrity_get_efi_secureboot().  Before loading the MOK/MOKx keys,
load_uefi_certs() calls integrity_get_efi_secureboot() directly.
Exactly.
With load_uefi_certs() calling integrity_get_efi_secureboot() directly, please
check to see whether an integrity_get_efi_secureboot() stub function needs to be
defined.
For CONFIG_LOAD_UEFI_KEYS and CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT, the
former depends on CONFIG_EFI while the latter is implied by the same, so

  integrity-$(CONFIG_EFI) += secureboot.o

should be enough. I've compile-tested the V3 on x86/arm64/powerpc/s390,
with various config combinations as much as I can think of. Let's see if
the kernel test robot could find out some corner cases.

-Ruiqi
Mimi
quoted
As of the name of the new file, as V3 has been sent earlier and still
uses secureboot.c, I can't change it there. I can do it in V4.

-Ruiqi
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help