Re: [PATCH v2] integrity: Extract secure boot enquiry function out of IMA
From: GONG Ruiqi <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-03 05:19:31
Also in:
keyrings, linux-integrity, linux-s390, lkml
From: GONG Ruiqi <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-03 05:19:31
Also in:
keyrings, linux-integrity, linux-s390, lkml
On 7/3/2025 11:35 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
...quoted
You're right. I didn't realize it's arch-specific in the first place, and moving and renaming arch_ima_get_secureboot() turned out to be a real mess ... So the V3 keeps the prototype of arch_ima_get_secureboot(), and only moves out its body, which I think can also better represent the intention of the patch.It's definitely much better. To summarize, arch_ima_get_secureboot() becomes a wrapper for integrity_get_efi_secureboot(). Before loading the MOK/MOKx keys, load_uefi_certs() calls integrity_get_efi_secureboot() directly.
Exactly.
With load_uefi_certs() calling integrity_get_efi_secureboot() directly, please check to see whether an integrity_get_efi_secureboot() stub function needs to be defined.
For CONFIG_LOAD_UEFI_KEYS and CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT, the former depends on CONFIG_EFI while the latter is implied by the same, so integrity-$(CONFIG_EFI) += secureboot.o should be enough. I've compile-tested the V3 on x86/arm64/powerpc/s390, with various config combinations as much as I can think of. Let's see if the kernel test robot could find out some corner cases. -Ruiqi
Mimiquoted
As of the name of the new file, as V3 has been sent earlier and still uses secureboot.c, I can't change it there. I can do it in V4. -Ruiqi