Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 6 authors, 2025-05-24

Re: Crash in __do_IRQ with gcc 15

From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2025-05-11 13:02:51
Subsystem: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest · Maintainers: Madhavan Srinivasan, Linus Torvalds


On 5/10/25 7:05 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Running Linux on Microwatt with a kernel compiled on an x86-64 system
running Fedora 42 (using the packaged cross-compiler, i.e. the
gcc-powerpcle64-linux-gnu package), I'm seeing a crash like this:

[    0.141591] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[    0.167628] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xc00a0000be8d6004
[    0.175409] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000000fcb4
cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c0000000012f78d0]
    pc: c00000000000fcb4: __do_IRQ+0x64/0x84
    lr: c00000000000fccc: __do_IRQ+0x7c/0x84
    sp: c0000000012f7b70
   msr: 9000000000001033
   dar: c00a0000be8d6004
 dsisr: 42000000
  current = 0xc0000000012de000
  paca    = 0xc00000000135d000   irqmask: 0x03   irq_happened: 0x01
    pid   = 0, comm = swapper/0
Linux version 6.15.0-rc1-00001-g72b73737d483-dirty (paulus@thinks) (powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 15.0.1 20250329 (Red Hat Cross 15.0.1-0), GNU ld version 2.44-1.fc42) #5 SMP Thu May  8 22:20:34 AEST 2025
enter ? for help
[c0000000012f7b70] c00000000000fd50 do_IRQ+0x7c/0x90 (unreliable)
[c0000000012f7ba0] c000000000007db4 hardware_interrupt_common_virt+0x1c4/0x1d0
--- Exception: 500 (Hardware Interrupt) at c00000000001c2ec arch_local_irq_restore+0x60/0xc4
[c0000000012f7ea0] c000000000083c68 do_idle+0xd4/0xf4
[c0000000012f7ee0] c000000000083e08 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x38
[c0000000012f7f10] c00000000000cc7c kernel_init+0x0/0x144
[c0000000012f7f40] c000000001000ecc do_one_initcall+0x0/0x160
[c0000000012f7fe0] c00000000000ba6c start_here_common+0x1c/0x20
0:mon>
Thanks for the debug.
What's happening is that gcc 15 seems to be using r2 as an ordinary
register, and r2 has a live value in it at the point where __do_IRQ()
calls call_do_irq().  Since r2 is not in the clobber list for the
inline asm in call_do_irq(), it doesn't get saved and restored around
the call to __do_irq(), and when we come back to __do_IRQ(), it has
been modified.  Then when __do_IRQ() subsequently does a store using
r2, it blows up like the above.

Adding r2 to the clobber list in call_do_irq() fixes it.  Does this
seem like the right fix?  Does it need to be conditional on the gcc
version?  Or is there a better way to fix the problem?
I guess if we plan to go with adding r2 to clobber, it has to be gcc 
specific, since my FC41 (gcc 14.1) complains of PIC registers usage
in the clobber list.

inlined from ‘__do_IRQ’ at arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c:297:3:                              
arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c:262:9: error: PIC register clobbered by ‘r2’ in ‘asm’              
 262 |         asm volatile (                                                               
     |         ^~~                      

Can you try with this patch, I am testing this in my setup.

Maddy

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index a0e8b998c9b5..2ce7a4f2b2fb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -276,7 +276,11 @@ static __always_inline void call_do_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, void *sp)
                   [callee] "i" (__do_irq)
                 : // Clobbers
                   "lr", "xer", "ctr", "memory", "cr0", "cr1", "cr5", "cr6",
+#if __GNUC__ >= 15
+                  "cr7", "r0", "r2", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", "r8", "r9", "r10",
+#else
                   "cr7", "r0", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", "r8", "r9", "r10",
+#endif
                   "r11", "r12"
        );
 }


Thanks,
Paul.
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help