On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 18:02, Jarkko Sakkinen [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 18:42, Jarkko Sakkinen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 01:12:20PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

quoted

quoted

I tried, but the last patch (this one) is based on the series merged
on the tip tree, where I introduced tpm_svsm.
I can see that series in linux-next merged with commit
16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07,
but I can't see it in your next tree [1].

How do we proceed in such cases?

Just to be sure, did I use the right tree?

Thanks for the remark. Lemme check tonight. Hold on doing
anything ;-) We'll get there...

I just rebased my branches on top of latest from Linus. That is what I
need base PR also on, and:

$ git show 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07
fatal: bad object 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07

I'd use git cherry-pick on a range to take them from linux-next to a
mainline tip...

I see, let me know if I can help in some way.

We can also wait the next cycle if it simplifies your work, definitely
no rush on my side.

Let's do it. At least it will then get a full round of testing before
ending up to a release.

Sure, I'll send v6 after the merge window.

Thanks,
Stefano

Thank you!

quoted

Thanks,
Stefano

BR, Jarkko