Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] powerpc: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-23 05:25:22
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-efi, linux-hardening, linux-kbuild, linux-kselftest, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-security-module, lkml, llvm, sparclinux
On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 21:39 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless the __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved. For s390 this requires forcing a couple functions to be inline with
I assume you mean powerpc here, though I'm sure my employer is happy that you're at least confusing us with IBM's other architecture :) -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited