Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: Move insn if/else into do_check_insn()

Eduard Zingerman [off-list ref] writes:

On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 09:35 +0200, Luis Gerhorst wrote:

quoted

+		dst_reg_type = cur_regs(env)[insn->dst_reg].type;

Implicitly relying on `insn == &env->prog->insnsi[env->cur_idx]`
is weird. Still think that `insn` parameter should be dropped and
computed inside this function instead.

quoted

+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+process_bpf_exit_full:

Nit: since we are refactoring I'd extract this as a function instead of goto.

Both done, thanks again for the review and testing!