Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 3 authors, 2025-05-12

Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Correct secvar format representation for static key management

From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-05 08:38:07
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Wed, 2025-04-30 at 14:33 +0530, Srish Srinivasan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On a PLPKS enabled PowerVM LPAR, the secvar format property for
static
key management is misrepresented as "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown", creating
reason for confusion.

Static key management mode uses fixed, built-in keys. Dynamic key
management mode allows keys to be updated in production to handle
security updates without firmware rebuilds.

Define a function named plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode() to retrieve the
key management mode based on the existence of the SB_VERSION property
in the firmware.

Set the secvar format property to either "ibm,plpks-sb-v1" or
"ibm,plpks-sb-v0" based on the key management mode, and return the
length of the secvar format property.

Co-developed-by: Souradeep <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Souradeep <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Srish Srinivasan <ssrish@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c | 70 +++++++++++------
--
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
index 257fd1f8bc19..d57067a733ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
@@ -152,39 +152,49 @@ static int plpks_set_variable(const char *key,
u64 key_len, u8 *data,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-// PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the
same way OPAL does.
-// Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION variable in the
keystore.
-// The string is made up by us, and takes the form "ibm,plpks-sb-
v<n>" (or "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown"
-// if the SB_VERSION variable doesn't exist). Hypervisor defines the
SB_VERSION variable as a
-// "1 byte unsigned integer value".
-static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
+/*
+ * Return the key management mode.
+ *
+ * SB_VERSION is defined as a "1 byte unsigned integer value". It is
owned by
+ * the Partition Firmware and its presence indicates that the key
management
+ * mode is dynamic. Only signed variables have null bytes in their
names.
+ * SB_VERSION does not.
+ *
+ * Return 1 to indicate that the key management mode is dynamic.
Otherwise
+ * return 0, indicating that the key management mode is static.
+ */
This description isn't accurate.

For dynamic mode, it doesn't return 1, it returns whatever version is
defined in SB_VERSION, which could be 1, or could at some later point be
a higher version.

Which makes the function name a bit of a misnomer too - it is returning
the version number, just the version number can now be zero.
+static u8 plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode(void)
 {
-	struct plpks_var var = {0};
-	ssize_t ret;
-	u8 version;
-
-	var.component = NULL;
-	// Only the signed variables have null bytes in their names,
this one doesn't
-	var.name = "SB_VERSION";
-	var.namelen = strlen(var.name);
-	var.datalen = 1;
-	var.data = &version;
-
-	// Unlike the other vars, SB_VERSION is owned by firmware
instead of the OS
-	ret = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
-	if (ret) {
-		if (ret == -ENOENT) {
-			ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-
unknown");
-		} else {
-			pr_err("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from
firmware\n", ret);
-			ret = -EIO;
-		}
-		goto err;
+	u8 mode;
+	ssize_t rc;
+	struct plpks_var var = {
+		.component = NULL,
+		.name = "SB_VERSION",
+		.namelen = 10,
+		.datalen = 1,
+		.data = &mode,
+	};
+
+	rc = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
+	if (rc) {
+		pr_info("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from
firmware\n", rc);
We need to check for -ENOENT, otherwise this message is going to be
printed every time you boot a machine in static mode.

I think you should handle this as the existing code does: if it's
ENOENT, return 0, and for other codes print an error and return -EIO.
+		mode = 0;
 	}
+	return mode;
+}
 
-	ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", version);
-err:
-	return ret;
+// PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the
same way
+// OPAL does. Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION
variable in the
+// keystore. The string, made up by us, takes the form "ibm,plpks-
sb-v<n>".Set
+// the secvar format property to either "ibm,plpks-sb-v1" or
"ibm,plpks-sb-v0",
+// based on the key management mode, and return the length of the
secvar format
+// property.
+static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
+{
+	u8 mode;
+
+	mode = plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode();
+	return snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", mode);
It might be better to use something like "ibm,plpks-sb-static" in place
of "ibm,plpks-sb-v0" to make it instantly clear that static mode
doesn't use the same version numbering scheme as dynamic mode.
 }
 
 static int plpks_max_size(u64 *max_size)
-- 
Andrew Donnellan    OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com   IBM Australia Limited
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help