Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 15 authors, 2025-04-26

Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2025-03-28 22:14:58
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, loongarch

On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
quoted
Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough
to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro
has more success than me.
I'll put them into mm.git, to advance things a bit.
I haven't heard from kunit maintainers yet. This thread got lost
in inbox due to travel.

David/Brendan/Rae, Okay to take this series?

Andrew, Okay to take this through your tree - this needs merging.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help