Re: [PATCH v6 05/26] fs/dax: Create a common implementation to break DAX layouts
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-01-13 00:47:52
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-cxl, linux-doc, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-xfs, lkml, loongarch, nvdimm
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:44:38AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 05:00:33PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:quoted
Prior to freeing a block file systems supporting FS DAX must check that the associated pages are both unmapped from user-space and not undergoing DMA or other access from eg. get_user_pages(). This is achieved by unmapping the file range and scanning the FS DAX page-cache to see if any pages within the mapping have an elevated refcount. This is done using two functions - dax_layout_busy_page_range() which returns a page to wait for the refcount to become idle on. Rather than open-code this introduce a common implementation to both unmap and wait for the page to become idle. Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>So now that Dan Carpenter has complained, I guess I should look at this...quoted
--- Changes for v5: - Don't wait for idle pages on non-DAX mappings Changes for v4: - Fixed some build breakage due to missing symbol exports reported by John Hubbard (thanks!). --- fs/dax.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 +--------- fs/fuse/dax.c | 27 +++------------------------ fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 23 +++++------------------ fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 2 +- include/linux/dax.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ mm/madvise.c | 8 ++++---- 7 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c index d010c10..9c3bd07 100644 --- a/fs/dax.c +++ b/fs/dax.c@@ -845,6 +845,39 @@ int dax_delete_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index) return ret; } +static int wait_page_idle(struct page *page, + void (cb)(struct inode *), + struct inode *inode) +{ + return ___wait_var_event(page, page_ref_count(page) == 1, + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, cb(inode)); +} + +/* + * Unmaps the inode and waits for any DMA to complete prior to deleting the + * DAX mapping entries for the range. + */ +int dax_break_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end, + void (cb)(struct inode *)) +{ + struct page *page; + int error; + + if (!dax_mapping(inode->i_mapping)) + return 0; + + do { + page = dax_layout_busy_page_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end); + if (!page) + break; + + error = wait_page_idle(page, cb, inode); + } while (error == 0);You didn't initialize error to 0, so it could be any value. What if dax_layout_busy_page_range returns null the first time through the loop?
Yes. I went down the rabbit hole of figuring out why this didn't produce a compiler warning and forgot to go back and fix it. Thanks.
quoted
+ + return error; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_break_mapping); + /* * Invalidate DAX entry if it is clean. */<I'm no expert, skipping to xfs>quoted
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index 42ea203..295730a 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c@@ -2715,21 +2715,17 @@ xfs_mmaplock_two_inodes_and_break_dax_layout( struct xfs_inode *ip2) { int error; - bool retry; struct page *page; if (ip1->i_ino > ip2->i_ino) swap(ip1, ip2); again: - retry = false; /* Lock the first inode */ xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL); - error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(VFS_I(ip1), &retry); - if (error || retry) { + error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(VFS_I(ip1)); + if (error) { xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL); - if (error == 0 && retry) - goto again;Hmm, so the retry loop has moved into xfs_break_dax_layouts, which means that we no longer cycle the MMAPLOCK. Why was the lock cycling unnecessary?
Because the lock cycling is already happening in the xfs_wait_dax_page() callback which is called as part of the retry loop in dax_break_mapping().
quoted
return error; }@@ -2988,19 +2984,11 @@ xfs_wait_dax_page( int xfs_break_dax_layouts( - struct inode *inode, - bool *retry) + struct inode *inode) { - struct page *page; - xfs_assert_ilocked(XFS_I(inode), XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL); - page = dax_layout_busy_page(inode->i_mapping); - if (!page) - return 0; - - *retry = true; - return dax_wait_page_idle(page, xfs_wait_dax_page, inode); + return dax_break_mapping_inode(inode, xfs_wait_dax_page); } int@@ -3018,8 +3006,7 @@ xfs_break_layouts( retry = false; switch (reason) { case BREAK_UNMAP: - error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode, &retry); - if (error || retry) + if (xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode))dax_break_mapping can return -ERESTARTSYS, right? So doesn't this need to be: error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(inode); if (error) break; Hm?
Right. Thanks for the review, have fixed for the next respin. - Alistair
--Dquoted
break; fallthrough; case BREAK_WRITE:diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h index 1648dc5..c4f03f6 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ xfs_itruncate_extents( return xfs_itruncate_extents_flags(tpp, ip, whichfork, new_size, 0); } -int xfs_break_dax_layouts(struct inode *inode, bool *retry); +int xfs_break_dax_layouts(struct inode *inode); int xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock, enum layout_break_reason reason);diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h index 9b1ce98..f6583d3 100644 --- a/include/linux/dax.h +++ b/include/linux/dax.h@@ -228,6 +228,20 @@ static inline void dax_read_unlock(int id) { } #endif /* CONFIG_DAX */ + +#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX) +static inline int __must_check dax_break_mapping(struct inode *inode, + loff_t start, loff_t end, void (cb)(struct inode *)) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void dax_break_mapping_uninterruptible(struct inode *inode, + void (cb)(struct inode *)) +{ +} +#endif + bool dax_alive(struct dax_device *dax_dev); void *dax_get_private(struct dax_device *dax_dev); long dax_direct_access(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff, long nr_pages,@@ -251,6 +265,13 @@ vm_fault_t dax_finish_sync_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, int dax_delete_mapping_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index); int dax_invalidate_mapping_entry_sync(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index); +int __must_check dax_break_mapping(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, + loff_t end, void (cb)(struct inode *)); +static inline int __must_check dax_break_mapping_inode(struct inode *inode, + void (cb)(struct inode *)) +{ + return dax_break_mapping(inode, 0, LLONG_MAX, cb); +} int dax_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff, struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff, loff_t len, bool *is_same,diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c index 49f3a75..1f4c99e 100644 --- a/mm/madvise.c +++ b/mm/madvise.c@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static int guard_install_pud_entry(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, pud_t pudval = pudp_get(pud); /* If huge return >0 so we abort the operation + zap. */ - return pud_trans_huge(pudval) || pud_devmap(pudval); + return pud_trans_huge(pudval); } static int guard_install_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int guard_install_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t pmdval = pmdp_get(pmd); /* If huge return >0 so we abort the operation + zap. */ - return pmd_trans_huge(pmdval) || pmd_devmap(pmdval); + return pmd_trans_huge(pmdval); } static int guard_install_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int guard_remove_pud_entry(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, pud_t pudval = pudp_get(pud); /* If huge, cannot have guard pages present, so no-op - skip. */ - if (pud_trans_huge(pudval) || pud_devmap(pudval)) + if (pud_trans_huge(pudval)) walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE; return 0;@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static int guard_remove_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t pmdval = pmdp_get(pmd); /* If huge, cannot have guard pages present, so no-op - skip. */ - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmdval) || pmd_devmap(pmdval)) + if (pmd_trans_huge(pmdval)) walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE; return 0;-- git-series 0.9.1