Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] elf: Define note name macros
From: Baoquan He <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-06 06:06:59
Also in:
kexec, linux-mm, linux-s390, lkml
On 01/06/25 at 02:07pm, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2025/01/06 11:21, Baoquan He wrote:quoted
On 01/04/25 at 11:38pm, Akihiko Odaki wrote:quoted
elf.h had a comment saying:quoted
Notes used in ET_CORE. Architectures export some of the arch register sets using the corresponding note types via the PTRACE_GETREGSET and PTRACE_SETREGSET requests. The note name for these types is "LINUX", except NT_PRFPREG that is named "CORE".However, NT_PRSTATUS is also named "CORE". It is also unclear what "these types" refers to. To fix these problems, define a name for each note type. The added definitions are macros so the kernel and userspace can directly refer to them. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h index b44069d29cec..014b705b97d7 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h@@ -372,8 +372,6 @@ typedef struct elf64_shdr { * Notes used in ET_CORE. Architectures export some of the arch register sets * using the corresponding note types via the PTRACE_GETREGSET and * PTRACE_SETREGSET requests. - * The note name for these types is "LINUX", except NT_PRFPREG that is named - * "CORE". */ #define NT_PRSTATUS 1 #define NT_PRFPREG 2@@ -460,9 +458,91 @@ typedef struct elf64_shdr { #define NT_LOONGARCH_HW_BREAK 0xa05 /* LoongArch hardware breakpoint registers */ #define NT_LOONGARCH_HW_WATCH 0xa06 /* LoongArch hardware watchpoint registers */ -/* Note types with note name "GNU" */ +/* Note used in ET_EXEC and ET_DYN. */ #define NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 5 +/* Note names */ +#define NN_PRSTATUS "CORE" +#define NN_PRFPREG "CORE" +#define NN_PRPSINFO "CORE" +#define NN_TASKSTRUCT "CORE" +#define NN_AUXV "CORE" +#define NN_SIGINFO "CORE" +#define NN_FILE "CORE" +#define NN_PRXFPREG "LINUX"No objection to make them clearer. Thanks for the effort. Wondering where below arch specific macros are used. So you just added all NN_xxx for the corresponding NT_xxx? Not sure if this is needed if we don't use them at all in the current kernel.Indeed I just added all NN_xxx. The kernel won't use the macros that are defined as "LINUX"; fs/binfmt_elf.c uses "LINUX" by default as the notes named "CORE" or "GNU" are exceptional. Userspace applications may still be interested in these macros as demonstrated in: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z3f7zJwu8bu8HYln@e133380.arm.com (local) These macros also serve as documentation; correcting and clarifying the documentation is the main purpose of this series.
I see, thanks. Then the overall series looks good to me.