Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 8 authors, 2024-12-17

Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

From: Jeff Johnson <hidden>
Date: 2024-12-10 23:14:31
Also in: ath11k, ceph-devel, dri-devel, intel-xe, linux-block, linux-bluetooth, linux-mm, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sound, linux-staging, linux-wireless, live-patching, lkml, netdev, netfilter-devel, xen-devel

On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
that use the multiply pattern of either of:
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)

where N is a constant, to avoid the multiplication.

The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.

CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <redacted>
I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them?

/jeff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help