Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] cpu/SMT: Provide a default topology_is_primary_thread()
From: Yicong Yang <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-01 03:18:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 2024/10/31 21:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31 2024 at 20:17, Yicong Yang wrote:quoted
On 2024/10/30 22:55, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
quoted
+static inline bool topology_is_primary_thread(unsigned int cpu) +{ + /* + * On SMT hotplug the primary thread of the SMT won't be disabled. + * Architectures do have a special primary thread (e.g. x86) need + * to override this function. Otherwise just make the first thread + * in the SMT as the primary thread. + */ + return cpu == cpumask_first(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));How is that supposed to work? Assume both siblings are offline, then the sibling mask is empty and you can't boot the CPU anymore.For architectures' using arch_topology, topology_sibling_cpumask() will at least contain the tested CPU itself. This is initialized in drivers/base/arch_topology.c:reset_cpu_topology(). So it won't be empty here.Fair enough. Can you please expand the comment and say: The sibling cpumask of a offline CPU contains always the CPU itself.
Sure, will make it clear.
quoted
Besides we don't need to check topology_is_primary_thread() at boot time: -> cpu_up(cpu) cpu_bootable() if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_ENABLED && cpu_smt_thread_allowed(cpu)) // will always return true if !CONFIG_SMT_NUM_THREADS_DYNAMIC return true; // we'll always return here and @cpu is always bootablecpu_smt_control is not guaranteed to have CPU_SMT_ENABLED state, so this argument is bogus.
sorry for didn't explain all the cases here.
For cpu_sm_control == {CPU_SMT_ENABLED, CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED, CPU_SMT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED},
all the cpu's bootable and we won't check topology_is_primary_thread().
static inline bool cpu_bootable(unsigned int cpu)
{
if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_ENABLED && cpu_smt_thread_allowed(cpu))
return true;
/* All CPUs are bootable if controls are not configured */
if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)
return true;
/* All CPUs are bootable if CPU is not SMT capable */
if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED)
return true;
if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu)) // Will be true for all the CPUs when thread sibling's not built
// Only true for primary thread if thread sibling's updated
// thread sibling will be updated once the CPU's bootup, for arm64
// in secondary_start_kernel()
return true;
return !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_booted_once_mask); // Also be updated once the CPU's bootup, in
// secondary_start_kernel() for arm64
// Will return false in the second check of
// cpu_bootable() in the call chain below
}
For cpu_smt_control == {CPUS_SMT_DISABLED, CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED} if user specified the
boot option "nosmt" or "nosmt=force", it'll be a bit more complex. For a non-primary
thread CPU, cpu_bootable() will return true and it'll be boot. Then after thread sibling's
built cpu_bootable() will be checked secondly it the cpuhp callbacks, since it'll return
false then and we'll roll back and offline it.
// for a non-primary thread CPU, system boot with "nosmt" or "nosmt=force"
-> cpu_up()
cpu_bootable() -> true, since the thread sibling mask only coutains CPU itself
[...]
cpuhp_bringup_ap()
bringup_wait_for_ap_online()
if (!cpu_bootable(cpu)) // target CPU has been bringup, thread sibling mask's updated
// then this non-primay thread won't be bootable in this case
return -ECANCELED // roll back and offline this CPU
Thanks.