Re: [PATCH 2/4] random: vDSO: Don't use PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_MASK
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-27 08:16:30
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
Le 27/08/2024 à 09:49, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:31:48AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
- ssize_t ret = min_t(size_t, INT_MAX & PAGE_MASK /* = MAX_RW_COUNT */, len); + const unsigned long page_size = 1UL << CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT; + const unsigned long page_mask = ~(page_size - 1); + ssize_t ret = min_t(size_t, INT_MAX & page_mask /* = MAX_RW_COUNT */, len);I'm really not a fan of making the code less idiomatic...
Ok, I have another idea, let's give it a try.
quoted
An easy solution would be to define PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_MASK in vDSO when they do not exist already, but this can be misleading.Why would what tglx and I suggested be misleading? That seems pretty normal... Are you worried they might mismatch somehow? (If so, why?)
All architectures have their own definition, they are all based on CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT and should give the same value but with some subtleties. The best would be to have an asm-generic definition of PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_MASK that all architectures use, but that's another level of work. tglx or yourself suggested to put in a one of the vdso headers instead of directly in getrandom.c. This is too fragile because PAGE_SIZE might be absent in that header but arrive in getrandom.c through another header. Christophe