Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 5 authors, 2024-08-27

Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feasture

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2024-08-26 06:32:33
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-s390, lkml, sparclinux, virtualization, xen-devel

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:30 PM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
Actually I meant, we can extend the virtio_config_ops to allow mapping
ops there, then simulator and VDUSE can hook the map ops there.
From a quick glance that feels like the right layer of abstraction,
although the config part of the name feels wrong at that point.
Right, or we could have a dedicated map_ops instead of trying to use
virtio_config_ops.

Thanks
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help