Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024, Alex Bennée wrote:
quoted
Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024, Alex Bennée wrote:
quoted
Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Now that hva_to_pfn() no longer supports being called in atomic context,
move the might_sleep() annotation from hva_to_pfn_slow() to
hva_to_pfn().
The commentary for hva_to_pfn_fast disagrees.
/*
* The fast path to get the writable pfn which will be stored in @pfn,
* true indicates success, otherwise false is returned. It's also the
* only part that runs if we can in atomic context.
*/
static bool hva_to_pfn_fast(struct kvm_follow_pfn *kfp, kvm_pfn_t *pfn)
At which point did it loose the ability to run in the atomic context? I
couldn't work it out from the commits.
It didn't lose the ability per se (calling hva_to_pfn_fast() in atomic context
would still be functionally ok), rather the previous patch
KVM: Drop @atomic param from gfn=>pfn and hva=>pfn APIs
removed support for doing so in order to simplify hva_to_pfn() as a whole.
It still sticks out given the only caller no longer enforces this.
Oh, sorry, I should have been more explicit. I'll fix the comment, I simply
missed it.
No worries, with the fixed comment:
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <redacted>
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro