Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2024-05-26 09:06:33
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-toolchains, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2024-05-22 · Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files · Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
- 2024-05-22 · Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files · Balasubrmanian, Vignesh <hidden>
- 2024-05-22 · Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files · Balasubrmanian, Vignesh <hidden>
- 2024-05-08 · Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files · Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
- 2024-05-08 · Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files · Kees Cook <hidden>
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 10:24:41AM +0530, Balasubrmanian, Vignesh wrote:
If we can add a new enum only when we extend, then as Thomas suggested can we use other kernel variables as in the first version of the patch until we extend for other/new features?
I assume by "other kernel variables" you mean CPUID?
If so, can you change the layout of your buffer once you export it to
userspace?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette