Re: [PATCH v2 29/37] powerpc/nohash: Replace pte_user() by pte_read()
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2023-11-06 13:22:52
Le 31/10/2023 à 11:15, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:quoted
pte_user() is now only used in pte_access_permitted() to check access on vmas. User flag is cleared to make a page unreadable. So rename it pte_read() and remove pte_user() which isn't used anymore. For the time being it checks _PAGE_USER but in the near futur all plateforms will be converted to _PAGE_READ so lets support both for now. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h | 7 ------- arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h | 13 +++++++------ arch/powerpc/mm/ioremap.c | 4 ---- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h index 62c965a4511a..1ee38befd29a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pte-8xx.h@@ -112,13 +112,6 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_t pte) #define pte_mkwrite_novma pte_mkwrite_novma -static inline bool pte_user(pte_t pte) -{ - return !(pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_SH); -} - -#define pte_user pte_user - static inline pte_t pte_mkhuge(pte_t pte) { return __pte(pte_val(pte) | _PAGE_SPS | _PAGE_HUGE);diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h index ee677162f9e6..aba56fe3b1c6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h@@ -160,9 +160,6 @@ static inline int pte_write(pte_t pte) return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_WRITE; } #endif -#ifndef pte_read -static inline int pte_read(pte_t pte) { return 1; } -#endif static inline int pte_dirty(pte_t pte) { return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_DIRTY; } static inline int pte_special(pte_t pte) { return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_SPECIAL; } static inline int pte_none(pte_t pte) { return (pte_val(pte) & ~_PTE_NONE_MASK) == 0; }@@ -190,10 +187,14 @@ static inline int pte_young(pte_t pte) * and PTE_64BIT, PAGE_KERNEL_X contains _PAGE_BAP_SR which is also in * _PAGE_USER. Need to explicitly match _PAGE_BAP_UR bit in that case too. */ -#ifndef pte_user -static inline bool pte_user(pte_t pte) +#ifndef pte_read +static inline bool pte_read(pte_t pte) { +#ifdef _PAGE_READ + return (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_READ) == _PAGE_READ; +#else return (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_USER) == _PAGE_USER; +#endif } #endif@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ static inline bool pte_access_permitted(pte_t pte, bool write) * A read-only access is controlled by _PAGE_USER bit. * We have _PAGE_READ set for WRITE and EXECUTE */ - if (!pte_present(pte) || !pte_user(pte) || !pte_read(pte)) + if (!pte_present(pte) || !pte_read(pte)) return false; if (write && !pte_write(pte))diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/ioremap.c index 7823c38f09de..7b0afcabd89f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/ioremap.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/ioremap.c@@ -50,10 +50,6 @@ void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long flags) if (pte_write(pte)) pte = pte_mkdirty(pte); - /* we don't want to let _PAGE_USER leak out */ - if (WARN_ON(pte_user(pte))) - return NULL;This check is still valid right? I understand that we want to remove _PAGE_USER. But then loosing this check is ok?
Well, we may have to think about it for book3s/64. For all others _PAGE_USER is gone and replaced by a check of addresses versus TASK_SIZE. As ioremap() will map into vmalloc space that address is necesserally correct.
quoted
- if (iowa_is_active()) return iowa_ioremap(addr, size, pte_pgprot(pte), caller); return __ioremap_caller(addr, size, pte_pgprot(pte), caller); -- 2.41.0