Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION c503e3eec382ac708ee7adf874add37b77c5d312
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-31 17:59:21
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-pci, linux-riscv, loongarch
Dan Williams wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:35:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:quoted
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: c503e3eec382ac708ee7adf874add37b77c5d312 Add linux-next specific files for 20231030 Error/Warning reports: ... https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310302206.Pkr5eBDi-lkp@intel.com (local)quoted
Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) Warning: MAINTAINERS references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bma400.yaml aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xbbc): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' ... arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h:67:(.text+0xd66): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' csky-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0x6e8): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921: undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xbc0): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' ... ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921: undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' loongarch64-linux-ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xa38): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' pci.c:(.text+0x662): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' powerpc-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0xf10): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' riscv64-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0x11ec): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer'I have no idea about the above (and all the similar ones below); I assume they all have to do with https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018171713.1883517-13-rrichter@amd.com (local)Yes, I will get this fix folded into cxl/next:diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h index f6ea2f57d808..3db310c19ab7 100644 --- a/include/linux/aer.h +++ b/include/linux/aer.h@@ -43,16 +43,20 @@ struct aer_capability_regs { #if defined(CONFIG_PCIEAER) int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev); int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev); +void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, + struct aer_capability_regs *aer); #else static inline int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev) { return -EINVAL; } static inline int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; } +static inline void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, + struct aer_capability_regs *aer) +{ +} #endif -void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, - struct aer_capability_regs *aer); int cper_severity_to_aer(int cper_severity); void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int severity, struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs);
Actually, no this was my fault for inadvertantly including this patch in the branch: http://lore.kernel.org/r/653c7eb29265c_244c8f2944b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch (local) ...which had the desired effect, but at the cost of thrashing linux-next. Apologies for that.