Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Date: 2023-09-22 10:37:37
Also in:
bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-modules, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-trace-kernel, lkml, loongarch, netdev, sparclinux
Hi Mike, On 18/09/2023 09:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org> The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Slightly reorder execmem_params initialization to support both 32 and 64 bit variants, define EXECMEM_KPROBES and EXECMEM_BPF ranges in riscv::execmem_params and drop overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> --- arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 10 ---------- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 13 ------------- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c index 343a0edfb6dd..31505ecb5c72 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c@@ -436,20 +436,39 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab, return 0; } -#if defined(CONFIG_MMU) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT) +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU static struct execmem_params execmem_params __ro_after_init = { .ranges = { [EXECMEM_DEFAULT] = { .pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL, .alignment = 1, }, + [EXECMEM_KPROBES] = { + .pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL_READ_EXEC, + .alignment = 1, + }, + [EXECMEM_BPF] = { + .pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL, + .alignment = 1,
Not entirely sure it is the same alignment (sorry did not go through the entire series), but if it is, the alignment above ^ is not the same that is requested by our current bpf_jit_alloc_exec() implementation which is PAGE_SIZE.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ }, }, }; struct execmem_params __init *execmem_arch_params(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_DEFAULT].start = MODULES_VADDR; execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_DEFAULT].end = MODULES_END; +#else + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_DEFAULT].start = VMALLOC_START; + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_DEFAULT].end = VMALLOC_END; +#endif + + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].start = VMALLOC_START; + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_KPROBES].end = VMALLOC_END; + + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_BPF].start = BPF_JIT_REGION_START; + execmem_params.ranges[EXECMEM_BPF].end = BPF_JIT_REGION_END; return &execmem_params; }diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c index 2f08c14a933d..e64f2f3064eb 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c@@ -104,16 +104,6 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_MMU -void *alloc_insn_page(void) -{ - return __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, 1, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END, - GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_READ_EXEC, - VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE, - __builtin_return_address(0)); -} -#endif - /* install breakpoint in text */ void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) {diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c index 7b70ccb7fec3..c8a758f0882b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c@@ -218,19 +218,6 @@ u64 bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit(void) return BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE; } -void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec(unsigned long size) -{ - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, BPF_JIT_REGION_START, - BPF_JIT_REGION_END, GFP_KERNEL, - PAGE_KERNEL, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, - __builtin_return_address(0)); -} - -void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr) -{ - return vfree(addr); -} - void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len) { int ret;
Otherwise, you can add: Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <redacted> Thanks, Alex