Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] mm/vmemmap: Allow architectures to override how vmemmap optimization works
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-11 04:28:00
Also in:
linux-mm
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
Le 10/07/2023 à 18:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :quoted
Architectures like powerpc will like to use different page table allocators and mapping mechanisms to implement vmemmap optimization. Similar to vmemmap_populate allow architectures to implement vmemap_populate_compound_pages Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted> --- mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c index a044a130405b..541b3f69a481 100644 --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ void __meminit vmemmap_verify(pte_t *pte, int node, start, end - 1); } +#ifndef vmemmap_populate_compound_pages pte_t * __meminit vmemmap_pte_populate(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, int node, struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct page *reuse)Should vmemmap_pte_populate() be static ? It looks odd to exclude a non-static function based on a non related macro. There are several such function in the block being excluded here. Can you explain why it is correct to do that ?
Those functions can actually be made static. But I will do that as a part of different patch. I will update this patch and make sure the #ifdef will only override the vmemmap_populate_compound_pages. modified mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ void __meminit vmemmap_verify(pte_t *pte, int node,start, end - 1); } -#ifndef vmemmap_populate_compound_pages pte_t * __meminit vmemmap_pte_populate(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, int node, struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct page *reuse)
@@ -359,6 +358,7 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_hugepages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,return 0; } +#ifndef vmemmap_populate_compound_pages /* * For compound pages bigger than section size (e.g. x86 1G compound * pages with 2M subsection size) fill the rest of sections as tail -aneesh