Re: [PATCH 00/79] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-06-23 12:43:18
Also in:
autofs, bpf, ceph-devel, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-efi, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-hardening, linux-mm, linux-nfs, linux-rdma, linux-s390, linux-security-module, linux-trace-kernel, linux-unionfs, linux-usb, linux-xfs, lkml, netdev, ntfs3, ocfs2-devel, selinux, v9fs
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:52:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
Jeff Layton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral
changes with this set. That will come later, as we convert individual
filesystems to use multigrain timestamps.
BTW, Linus has suggested to me that whenever a conccinelle script is used,
it should be included in the change log.
Ok, here's what I have. I note again that my usage of coccinelle is
pretty primitive, so I ended up doing a fair bit of by-hand fixing after
applying these.
Given the way that this change is broken up into 77 patches by
subsystem, to which changelogs should I add it? I could add it to the
"infrastructure" patch, but that's the one where I _didn't_ use it.
Maybe to patch #79 (the one that renames i_ctime)?
That works. I can also put this into a merge commit or pr message.