quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Jun 20, 2023, at 7:46 AM, Yair Podemsky [off-list ref] wrote:
@@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ static void collapse_and_free_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *v
addr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
- tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+ tlb_remove_table_sync_one(mm);
Can’t pmdp_collapse_flush() have one additional argument “freed_tables”
that it would propagate, for instance on x86 to flush_tlb_mm_range() ?
Then you would not need tlb_remove_table_sync_one() to issue an additional
IPI, no?
It just seems that you might still have 2 IPIs in many cases instead of
one, and unless I am missing something, I don’t see why.