Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 2 authors, 2023-03-06

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/powerpc/kvm: kvmppc_hv_entry: remove .global scope

From: Kautuk Consul <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-20 07:30:08

Hi Sathvika,

(Sorry didn't include list in earlier email.)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:35:09PM +0530, Sathvika Vasireddy wrote:
Hi Kautuk,

On 20/02/23 10:53, Kautuk Consul wrote:
quoted
kvmppc_hv_entry isn't called from anywhere other than
book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S itself. Removing .global scope for
this function.

Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <redacted>
---
  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index acf80915f406..7e063fde7adc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -502,7 +502,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
   *                                                                            *
   *****************************************************************************/
-.global kvmppc_hv_entry
  kvmppc_hv_entry:
  	/* Required state:
I see the following objtool warning with this patch applied.
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x48:
unannotated intra-function call

Annotating kvmppc_hv_entry symbol with SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL and SYM_FUNC_END
macros should help fix this warning.
Not sure where to put the SYM_FUNC_END annotation.
Will the following do:
<snip>
    ld  r0, VCPU_GPR(R0)(r4)
    ld  r2, VCPU_GPR(R2)(r4)
    ld  r3, VCPU_GPR(R3)(r4)
    ld  r4, VCPU_GPR(R4)(r4)
    HRFI_TO_GUEST
    b   .

SYM_FUNC_END(kvmppc_hv_entry)

secondary_too_late:
    li  r12, 0

?

Thanks.
Thanks,
Sathvika
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help