Re: [PATCH] powerpc/secvar: Use u64 in secvar_operations

On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:

There's no reason for secvar_operations to use uint64_t vs the more
common kernel type u64.

The types are compatible, but they require different printk format
strings which can lead to confusion.

Change all the secvar related routines to use u64.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

We're going to include this patch in the next revision of our dynamic
key management series.

-- 
Andrew Donnellan    OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com   IBM Australia Limited