Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] lazy tlb: allow lazy tlb mm refcounting to be configurable
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-23 08:02:54
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-23 08:02:54
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm
On 1/23/23 9:35 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
quoted
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU_LAZY_TLB_REFCOUNT)) { + mmdrop(mm); + } else { + /* + * mmdrop_lazy_tlb must provide a full memory barrier, see the + * membarrier comment finish_task_switch which relies on this. + */ + smp_mb(); + } }Considering the fact that mmdrop_lazy_tlb() replaced mmdrop() in various locations in which smp_mb() was not required, this comment might be confusing. IOW, for the cases in most cases where mmdrop_lazy_tlb() replaced mmdrop(), this comment was irrelevant, and therefore it now becomes confusing. I am not sure the include the smp_mb() here instead of "open-coding" it helps.
I think that I now understand why you do need the smp_mb() here, so ignore my comment.