Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 7 authors, 2023-02-05

Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-25 16:46:23
Also in: live-patching, lkml

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:09:56PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
quoted
@@ -514,9 +515,18 @@ static int restore_r2(const char *name, u32 *instruction, struct module *me)
        if (!instr_is_relative_link_branch(ppc_inst(*prev_insn)))
                return 0;

-       if (*instruction != PPC_RAW_NOP()) {
+       /*
+        * For livepatch, the restore r2 instruction might have already been
+        * written previously, if the referenced symbol is in a previously
+        * unloaded module which is now being loaded again.  In that case, skip
+        * the warning and the instruction write.
+        */
+       if (insn_val == PPC_INST_LD_TOC)
+               return 0;
Do we need "sym->st_shndx == SHN_LIVEPATCH" here?
My original patch had that check, but I dropped it for simplicity.

In the non-livepatch case, the condition should never be true, but it
doesn't hurt to check it anyway.

-- 
Josh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help