Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2023-01-26

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] Resend LED patches

From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2023-01-20 17:48:25
Also in: linux-leds, lkml

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, at 18:15, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
quoted
Marek Behún (3):
  leds: turris-omnia: support HW controlled mode via private trigger
  leds: turris-omnia: initialize multi-intensity to full
  leds: turris-omnia: change max brightness from 255 to 1

Pali Rohár (5):
  dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low property
  leds: syscon: Implement support for active-low property
  powerpc/85xx: DTS: Add CPLD definitions for P1021RDB Combo Board CPL
    Design
  dt-bindings: leds: Add cznic,turris1x-leds.yaml binding
  leds: Add support for Turris 1.x LEDs

 .../testing/sysfs-class-led-driver-turris1x   |  31 ++
 .../bindings/leds/cznic,turris1x-leds.yaml    | 118 +++++
 .../bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml       |   5 +
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc.dtsi    |  92 ++++
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc_32b.dts |   6 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020mbg-pc_36b.dts |   6 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020rdb-pd.dts     |  44 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc.dtsi    |  37 ++
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc_32b.dts |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1020utm-pc_36b.dts |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc.dtsi    |  37 ++
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc_32b.dts |   5 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1021rdb-pc_36b.dts |   5 +-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi    |  33 +-
quoted
quoted
 drivers/leds/Kconfig                          |  10 +
 drivers/leds/Makefile                         |   1 +
 drivers/leds/leds-syscon.c                    |  14 +-
 drivers/leds/leds-turris-1x.c                 | 474 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia.c              |  46 +-
If everyone is convinced that applying these drivers is the correct
thing to do, I'd be happy to (rather) take them via LEDs.
Ok, thanks. I had not actually looked at the patches until today.
They were in the soc tree backlog but appeared to be misplaced
there until I read the  0/10 message text.

Looking at it now, I see:

- patches 1 and 2 seem obvious and have been reviewed by
  others already

- patch 3 is for arch/powerpc and should get merged through
  there if there are no objections to the binding in patch 4.

- patch 5 is the big driver patch, with a Reviewed-by tag
  from Marek Behún, who is the author of the last three patches.
  An earlier version of this patch was sent in June and got
  a few Acks and detailed feedback from Andy [1], but he's also
  not on Cc, and I don't know if his comments are all resolved
  in this version.

- Patches 6, 7 and 8 all seem simple LED subsystem patches,
  they just need review from you in order to get applied.
  These are also missing a Signed-off-by from the submitter
  in addition to the author in order to be applied.
  
      Arnd

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75Vcr6o2rm+T6Tr8sS4VXCLVHtmLPWy-njOKAvO4AcZoW=A@mail.gmail.com/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help