Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2022-11-03

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pcmcia: Convert to use pci_bus_for_each_resource_p()

From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: 2022-11-03 18:50:20
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-pci, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

Am Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:29:44AM +0900 schrieb Krzysztof Wilczyński:
Hello,

[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
-
-	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM; i++) {
-		res = s->cb_dev->bus->resource[i];
-#else
-	pci_bus_for_each_resource(s->cb_dev->bus, res, i) {
 #endif
+
+	pci_bus_for_each_resource_p(s->cb_dev->bus, res) {
 		if (!res)
 			continue;
Doesn't this remove the proper iterator for X86? Even if that is the right
thing to do, it needs an explict explanation.
I dunno what was in 2010, but reading code now I have found no differences in
the logic on how resources are being iterated in these two pieces of code.
This code is over a decade old (13 years old to be precise) and there was
something odd between Bjorn's and Jesse's patches, as per:

  89a74ecccd1f ("PCI: add pci_bus_for_each_resource(), remove direct bus->resource[] refs")
  cf26e8dc4194 ("pcmcia: do not autoadd root PCI bus resources")
quoted
But fine, I will add a line to a commit message about this change.
I wouldn't, personally.  The change you are proposing is self-explanatory
and somewhat in-line with what is there already - unless I am also reading
the current implementation wrong.

That said, Dominik is the maintainer of PCMCIA driver, so his is the last
word, so to speak. :)
quoted
Considering this is done, can you issue your conditional tag so I will
incorporate it in v3?
No need, really.  Again, unless Dominik thinks otherwise.
Ah, thanks for the correction. Then v2 is perfectly fine.

Thanks,
	Dominik
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help