Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2022-10-09

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] treewide: use prandom_u32_max() when possible

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: 2022-10-08 02:21:51
Also in: dri-devel, kernel-janitors, linux-block, linux-crypto, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-nvme, linux-patches, linux-rdma, linux-s390, linux-um, linux-usb, linux-wireless, lkml, loongarch, netdev, sparclinux

On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 03:47:44PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 12:01:03PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
quoted
Rather than incurring a division or requesting too many random bytes for
the given range, use the prandom_u32_max() function, which only takes
the minimum required bytes from the RNG and avoids divisions.
I actually meant splitting the by-hand stuff by subsystem, but nearly
all of these can be done mechanically too, so it shouldn't be bad. Notes
below...
Oh, cool, more coccinelle. You're basically giving me a class on these
recipes. Much appreciated.
quoted
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 92bcc1768f0b..87203429f802 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ unsigned long __get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
 {
 	if (!(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) && randomize_va_space)
-		sp -= get_random_int() & ~PAGE_MASK;
+		sp -= prandom_u32_max(PAGE_SIZE);
 	return sp & ~0xf;
 }
 
@mask@
expression MASK;
@@

- (get_random_int() & ~(MASK))
+ prandom_u32_max(MASK)
Not quite! PAGE_MASK != PAGE_SIZE. In this case, things get a litttttle
more complicated where you can do:

get_random_int() & MASK == prandom_u32_max(MASK + 1)
*only if all the top bits of MASK are set* That is, if MASK one less
than a power of two. Or if MASK & (MASK + 1) == 0.

(If those top bits aren't set, you can technically do
prandom_u32_max(MASK >> n + 1) << n. That'd be a nice thing to work out.
But yeesh, maybe a bit much for the time being and probably a bit beyond
coccinelle.)

This case here, though, is a bit more special, where we can just rely on
an obvious given kernel identity. Namely, PAGE_MASK == ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1).
So ~PAGE_MASK == PAGE_SIZE - 1.
So get_random_int() & ~PAGE_MASK == prandom_u32_max(PAGE_SIZE - 1 + 1).
So get_random_int() & ~PAGE_MASK == prandom_u32_max(PAGE_SIZE).

And most importantly, this makes the code more readable, since everybody
knows what bounding by PAGE_SIZE means, where as what on earth is
happening with the &~PAGE_MASK thing. So it's a good change. I'll try to
teach coccinelle about that special case.


quoted
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/vdso.c
index f32c38abd791..8c9826062652 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static unsigned long vdso_base(void)
 	unsigned long base = STACK_TOP;
 
 	if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) {
-		base += get_random_int() & (VDSO_RANDOMIZE_SIZE - 1);
+		base += prandom_u32_max(VDSO_RANDOMIZE_SIZE);
 		base = PAGE_ALIGN(base);
 	}
 
@minus_one@
expression FULL;
@@

- (get_random_int() & ((FULL) - 1)
+ prandom_u32_max(FULL)
Ahh, well, okay, this is the example I mentioned above. Only works if
FULL is saturated. Any clever way to get coccinelle to prove that? Can
it look at the value of constants?
quoted
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/vdso.c
index 63dc44c4c246..47e5960a2f96 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 
 	map_base = mm->mmap_base;
 	if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
-		map_base -= (get_random_int() & 0x1f) * PAGE_SIZE;
+		map_base -= prandom_u32_max(0x20) * PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	vdso_text_start = get_unmapped_area(NULL, map_base, vdso_text_len, 0, 0);
 
These are more fun, but Coccinelle can still do them with a little
Pythonic help:

// Find a potential literal
@literal_mask@
expression LITERAL;
identifier randfunc =~ "get_random_int|prandom_u32|get_random_u32";
position p;
@@

        (randfunc()@p & (LITERAL))

// Add one to the literal.
@script:python add_one@
literal << literal_mask.LITERAL;
RESULT;
@@

if literal.startswith('0x'):
        value = int(literal, 16) + 1
        coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("0x%x" % (value))
elif literal[0] in '123456789':
        value = int(literal, 10) + 1
        coccinelle.RESULT = cocci.make_expr("%d" % (value))
else:
        print("I don't know how to handle: %s" % (literal))

// Replace the literal mask with the calculated result.
@plus_one@
expression literal_mask.LITERAL;
position literal_mask.p;
expression add_one.RESULT;
identifier FUNC;
@@

-       (FUNC()@p & (LITERAL))
+       prandom_u32_max(RESULT)
Oh that's pretty cool. I can do the saturation check in python, since
`value` holds the parsed result. Neat.
quoted
diff --git a/fs/ext2/ialloc.c b/fs/ext2/ialloc.c
index 998dd2ac8008..f4944c4dee60 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/ialloc.c
@@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent)
 		int best_ndir = inodes_per_group;
 		int best_group = -1;
 
-		group = prandom_u32();
-		parent_group = (unsigned)group % ngroups;
+		parent_group = prandom_u32_max(ngroups);
 		for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
 			group = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
 			desc = ext2_get_group_desc (sb, group, NULL);
Okay, that one is too much for me -- checking that group is never used
after the assignment removal is likely possible, but beyond my cocci
know-how. :)
Yea this is a tricky one, which I initially didn't do by hand, but Jan
seemed fine with it, and it's clear if you look at it. Trixy cocci
indeed.
quoted
diff --git a/lib/test_hexdump.c b/lib/test_hexdump.c
index 0927f44cd478..41a0321f641a 100644
--- a/lib/test_hexdump.c
+++ b/lib/test_hexdump.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(size_t buflen, size_t len,
 static void __init test_hexdump_overflow_set(size_t buflen, bool ascii)
 {
 	unsigned int i = 0;
-	int rs = (prandom_u32_max(2) + 1) * 16;
+	int rs = prandom_u32_max(2) + 1 * 16;
 
 	do {
 		int gs = 1 << i;
This looks wrong. Cocci says:

-       int rs = (get_random_int() % 2 + 1) * 16;
+       int rs = (prandom_u32_max(2) + 1) * 16;
!! Nice catch.

Alright, I'll give this a try with more cocci. The big difficulty at the
moment is the power of 2 constant checking thing. If you have any
pointers on that, would be nice.

Thanks a bunch for the guidance.

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help