Thread (3 messages) read the whole thread 3 messages, 3 authors, 2022-10-06

Re: [PATCH] tty: evh_bytechan: Replace NO_IRQ by 0

From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Date: 2022-10-06 07:35:43
Also in: lkml


On 10/6/2022 8:20 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().

On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.

irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.

So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
  drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c b/drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c
index 19d32cb6af84..8595483f4697 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int find_console_handle(void)
  		return 0;
  
  	stdout_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
-	if (stdout_irq == NO_IRQ) {
+	if (!stdout_irq) {
  		pr_err("ehv-bc: no 'interrupts' property in %pOF node\n", np);
  		return 0;
  	}
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int ehv_bc_tty_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  
  	bc->rx_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
  	bc->tx_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
-	if ((bc->rx_irq == NO_IRQ) || (bc->tx_irq == NO_IRQ)) {
+	if (!bc->rx_irq || !bc->tx_irq) {
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no 'interrupts' property in %pOFn node\n",
  			np);
  		ret = -ENODEV;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help