Re: [PATCH 2/7] powerpc: move __end_rodata to cover arch read-only sections
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-09-16 00:29:42
On Thu Sep 15, 2022 at 10:47 PM AEST, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Nicholas Piggin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
powerpc has a number of read-only sections and tables that are put after RO_DATA(). Move the __end_rodata symbol to cover these as well. Setting memory to read-only at boot is done using __init_begin, change that that to use __end_rodata.Did you just do that because it seems logical?
I actually was looking at moving init so runtime code and data is closer.
Because it does seem logical, but it leaves a RWX region in the gap between __end_rodata and __init_begin, which is bad. This is the current behaviour, on radix: ---[ Start of kernel VM ]--- 0xc000000000000000-0xc000000001ffffff 0x0000000000000000 32M r X pte valid present dirty accessed 0xc000000002000000-0xc00000007fffffff 0x0000000002000000 2016M r w pte valid present dirty accessed And with your change: ---[ Start of kernel VM ]--- 0xc000000000000000-0xc0000000013fffff 0x0000000000000000 20M r X pte valid present dirty accessed 0xc000000001400000-0xc000000001ffffff 0x0000000001400000 12M r w X pte valid present dirty accessed 0xc000000002000000-0xc00000007fffffff 0x0000000002000000 2016M r w pte valid present dirty accessed On radix the 16M alignment is larger than we need, but we need to chose a value at build time that works for radix and hash. We could make the code smarter on radix, to mark those pages in between __end_rodata and __init_begin as RW_ and use them for data. But that would be a more involved change.
Ah, yes Christophe pointed out it's broken too. We could just align __end_rodata to STRICT_ALIGN_SIZE for this patch? Thanks, Nick