Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] powerpc/code-patching: add patch_memory() for writing RO text
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-01 07:02:23
Le 01/09/2022 à 07:58, Benjamin Gray a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Russell Currey <redacted> powerpc allocates a text poke area of one page that is used by patch_instruction() to modify read-only text when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is enabled. patch_instruction() is only designed for instructions, so writing data using the text poke area can only happen 4 bytes at a time - each with a page map/unmap, pte flush and syncs. This patch introduces patch_memory(), implementing the same interface as memcpy(), similar to x86's text_poke() and s390's s390_kernel_write(). patch_memory() only needs to map the text poke area once, unless the write would cross a page boundary. Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <redacted> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h index 1c6316ec4b74..3de90748bce7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int create_cond_branch(ppc_inst_t *instr, const u32 *addr, int patch_branch(u32 *addr, unsigned long target, int flags); int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); +void *patch_memory(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size); static inline unsigned long patch_site_addr(s32 *site) {diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index 6edf0697a526..0cca39af44cb 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/code-patching.h> #include <asm/inst.h> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> static int __patch_instruction(u32 *exec_addr, ppc_inst_t instr, u32 *patch_addr) {@@ -183,6 +184,65 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) return err; } + +static int do_patch_memory(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size) +{ + int err; + unsigned long text_poke_addr, patch_addr; + + text_poke_addr = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(text_poke_area)->addr; + + err = map_patch_area(dest, text_poke_addr);
This is not in line with the optimisation done by https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220815114840.1468656-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au/
+ if (err) + return err; + + patch_addr = text_poke_addr + offset_in_page(dest); + copy_to_kernel_nofault((u8 *)patch_addr, src, size);
copy_to_kernel_nofault() has a performance cost.
+ + flush_icache_range(patch_addr, size);
Is that needed ? We are patching data, not text.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ unmap_patch_area(text_poke_addr); + + return 0; +} + +/** + * patch_memory - write data using the text poke area + * + * @dest: destination address + * @src: source address + * @size: size in bytes + * + * like memcpy(), but using the text poke area. No atomicity guarantees. + * Do not use for instructions, use patch_instruction() instead. + * Handles crossing page boundaries, though you shouldn't need to. + * + * Return value: + * @dest + **/ +void *patch_memory(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size) +{ + int err; + unsigned long flags; + size_t written, write_size; + + // If the poke area isn't set up, it's early boot and we can just memcpy. + if (!this_cpu_read(text_poke_area)) + return memcpy(dest, src, size); + + for (written = 0; written < size; written += write_size) { + // Write as much as possible without crossing a page boundary. + write_size = min_t(size_t, size - written, + PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(dest + written)); + + local_irq_save(flags); + err = do_patch_memory(dest + written, src + written, write_size); + local_irq_restore(flags); + if (err) + return ERR_PTR(err); + } + + return dest; +} #else /* !CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX */ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr)@@ -190,6 +250,11 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr); } +void *patch_memory(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size) +{ + return memcpy(dest, src, size);
In do_patch_memory() you have flush_icache_range(patch_addr, size); If that's really needed there, why don't we need it here as well ?
+} + #endif /* CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX */ __ro_after_init DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_mem_is_free); -- 2.37.2