Re: [PATCH 6/7] nouveau/dmem: Evict device private memory during release
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-09-28 21:23:20
Also in:
amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-mm, lkml, nouveau
On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 11:39 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
Felix Kuehling [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 2022-09-26 17:35, Lyude Paul wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 16:03 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:quoted
When the module is unloaded or a GPU is unbound from the module it is possible for device private pages to be left mapped in currently running processes. This leads to a kernel crash when the pages are either freed or accessed from the CPU because the GPU and associated data structures and callbacks have all been freed. Fix this by migrating any mappings back to normal CPU memory prior to freeing the GPU memory chunks and associated device private pages. Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> --- I assume the AMD driver might have a similar issue. However I can't see where device private (or coherent) pages actually get unmapped/freed during teardown as I couldn't find any relevant calls to devm_memunmap(), memunmap(), devm_release_mem_region() or release_mem_region(). So it appears that ZONE_DEVICE pages are not being properly freed during module unload, unless I'm missing something?I've got no idea, will poke Ben to see if they know the answer to thisI guess we're relying on devm to release the region. Isn't the whole point of using devm_request_free_mem_region that we don't have to remember to explicitly release it when the device gets destroyed? I believe we had an explicit free call at some point by mistake, and that caused a double-free during module unload. See this commit for reference:Argh, thanks for that pointer. I was not so familiar with devm_request_free_mem_region()/devm_memremap_pages() as currently Nouveau explicitly manages that itself.
Mhm, TBH I feel like this was going to happen eventually anyway but there's another reason for nouveau to start using the managed versions of these functions at some point
quoted
commit 22f4f4faf337d5fb2d2750aff13215726814273e Author: Philip Yang [off-list ref] Date: Mon Sep 20 17:25:52 2021 -0400 drm/amdkfd: fix svm_migrate_fini warning Device manager releases device-specific resources when a driver disconnects from a device, devm_memunmap_pages and devm_release_mem_region calls in svm_migrate_fini are redundant. It causes below warning trace after patch "drm/amdgpu: Split amdgpu_device_fini into early and late", so remove function svm_migrate_fini. BUG: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1718 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at drivers/base/devres.c:795 devm_release_action+0x51/0x60 Call Trace: ? memunmap_pages+0x360/0x360 svm_migrate_fini+0x2d/0x60 [amdgpu] kgd2kfd_device_exit+0x23/0xa0 [amdgpu] amdgpu_amdkfd_device_fini_sw+0x1d/0x30 [amdgpu] amdgpu_device_fini_sw+0x45/0x290 [amdgpu] amdgpu_driver_release_kms+0x12/0x30 [amdgpu] drm_dev_release+0x20/0x40 [drm] release_nodes+0x196/0x1e0 device_release_driver_internal+0x104/0x1d0 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x7a/0xd0 pci_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x90 amdgpu_exit+0x11/0x20 [amdgpu] Signed-off-by: Philip Yang [off-list ref] Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher [off-list ref] Furthermore, I guess we are assuming that nobody is using the GPU when the module is unloaded. As long as any processes have /dev/kfd open, you won't be able to unload the module (except by force-unload). I suppose with ZONE_DEVICE memory, we can have references to device memory pages even when user mode has closed /dev/kfd. We do have a cleanup handler that runs in an MMU-free-notifier. In theory that should run after all the pages in the mm_struct have been freed. It releases all sorts of other device resources and needs the driver to still be there. I'm not sure if there is anything preventing a module unload before the free-notifier runs. I'll look into that.Right - module unload (or device unbind) is one of the other ways we can hit this issue in Nouveau at least. You can end up with ZONE_DEVICE pages mapped in a running process after the module has unloaded. Although now you mention it that seems a bit wrong - the pgmap refcount should provide some protection against that. Will have to look into that too.quoted
Regards, Felixquoted
quoted
--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c index 66ebbd4..3b247b8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c@@ -369,6 +369,52 @@ nouveau_dmem_suspend(struct nouveau_drm *drm) mutex_unlock(&drm->dmem->mutex); } +/* + * Evict all pages mapping a chunk. + */ +void +nouveau_dmem_evict_chunk(struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk) +{ + unsigned long i, npages = range_len(&chunk->pagemap.range) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + unsigned long *src_pfns, *dst_pfns; + dma_addr_t *dma_addrs; + struct nouveau_fence *fence; + + src_pfns = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*src_pfns), GFP_KERNEL); + dst_pfns = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*dst_pfns), GFP_KERNEL); + dma_addrs = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*dma_addrs), GFP_KERNEL); + + migrate_device_range(src_pfns, chunk->pagemap.range.start >> PAGE_SHIFT, + npages); + + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) { + if (src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) { + struct page *dpage; + + /* + * _GFP_NOFAIL because the GPU is going away and there + * is nothing sensible we can do if we can't copy the + * data back. + */You'll have to excuse me for a moment since this area of nouveau isn't one of my strongpoints, but are we sure about this? IIRC __GFP_NOFAIL means infinite retry, in the case of a GPU hotplug event I would assume we would rather just stop trying to migrate things to the GPU and just drop the data instead of hanging on infinite retries.quoted
+ dpage = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_NOFAIL); + dst_pfns[i] = migrate_pfn(page_to_pfn(dpage)); + nouveau_dmem_copy_one(chunk->drm, + migrate_pfn_to_page(src_pfns[i]), dpage, + &dma_addrs[i]); + } + } + + nouveau_fence_new(chunk->drm->dmem->migrate.chan, false, &fence); + migrate_device_pages(src_pfns, dst_pfns, npages); + nouveau_dmem_fence_done(&fence); + migrate_device_finalize(src_pfns, dst_pfns, npages); + kfree(src_pfns); + kfree(dst_pfns); + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) + dma_unmap_page(chunk->drm->dev->dev, dma_addrs[i], PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); + kfree(dma_addrs); +} + void nouveau_dmem_fini(struct nouveau_drm *drm) {@@ -380,8 +426,10 @@ nouveau_dmem_fini(struct nouveau_drm *drm) mutex_lock(&drm->dmem->mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp, &drm->dmem->chunks, list) { + nouveau_dmem_evict_chunk(chunk); nouveau_bo_unpin(chunk->bo); nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, &chunk->bo); + WARN_ON(chunk->callocated); list_del(&chunk->list); memunmap_pages(&chunk->pagemap); release_mem_region(chunk->pagemap.range.start,
-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat