On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:45 PM Anshuman Khandual
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 9/20/22 09:09, Barry Song wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 3:00 PM Anshuman Khandual
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 8/22/22 13:51, Yicong Yang wrote:
quoted
+static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return true;
+}
This needs to be conditional on systems, where there will be performance
improvements, and should not just be enabled all the time on all systems.
num_online_cpus() > X, which does not hold any cpu hotplug lock would be
a good metric ?
for a small system, i don't see how this patch will help, e.g. cpus <= 4;
so we can actually disable tlb-batch on small systems.
Do not subscribe ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH based on NR_CPUS ?
That might not help much as the default value is 256 for NR_CPUS.
OR
arch_tlbbatch_should_defer() checks on
1. online cpus (dont enable batched TLB if <= X)
2. ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI (dont enable batched TLB)
quoted
just need to check if we will have any race condition since hotplug will
make the condition true and false dynamically.
If should_defer_flush() evaluate to be false, then ptep_clear_flush()
clears and flushes the entry right away. This should not race with other
queued up TLBI requests, which will be flushed separately. Wondering how
there can be a race here !
Right. How about we make something as below?
static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/* for a small system very small number of CPUs, TLB shootdown is cheap */
if (num_online_cpus() <= 4 ||
unlikely(this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI)))
return false;
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI
if (unlikely(this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI)))
return false;
#endif
return true;
}
Thanks
Barry