Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in preparation for phylink conversion
From: Sean Anderson <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-18 19:14:20
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev
On 8/18/22 2:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:37:23 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:quoted
On 8/18/22 2:20 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:16:24 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:quoted
This series contains several cleanup patches for dpaa/fman. While they are intended to prepare for a phylink conversion, they stand on their own. This series was originally submitted as part of [1].Still over the limit of patches in a patch series, and looks pretty easy to chunk up. We review and apply patches in netdev in 1-3 days, it really is more efficient to post smaller series.Last time I offered to arbitrarily chunk things [1], but I did not receive a response for 3 weeks.I sent you the link to the rules. Admittedly not the most polite and clear feedback to put it mildly but that was the reason.
It would have helped if you'd clarified; I thought the primary thing was the missing net-next.
quoted
quoted
And with the other series you sent to the list we have nearly 50 patches from you queued for review. I don't think this is reasonable, people reviewing this code are all volunteers trying to get their work done as well :(These patches have been sent to the list in one form or another since I first sent out an RFC for DPAA conversion back in June [2]. I have not substantially modified any of them (although I did add a few more since v2). It's not like I came up with these just now; I have been seeking feedback on these series for 2-3 months so far. The only reviews I have gotten were from Camelia Groza, who has provided some helpful feedback.Ack, no question. I'm trying to tell you got to actually get stuff in. It's the first week after the merge window and people are dumping code the had written over the dead time on the list, while some reviewers and maintainers are still on their summer vacation. So being considerate is even more important than normally.
OK, so perhaps a nice place to split the series is after patch 11. If you would like to review/apply a set of <15 patches, that is the place to break things. I can of course resend again with just those, if that's what I need to do to get these applied. That said, I specifically broke this series up into many small patches to make it easier to review. Each patch does exactly one thing. Had I known about these limits based on patch size, I would have just squashed everything into 15 patches. I think an arbitrary limit such as this has a perverse incentive. --Sean