Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/ppc-opcode: Define and use PPC_RAW_TRAP() and PPC_RAW_TW()
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2022-08-03 10:39:07
Also in:
lkml
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2022-08-03 10:39:07
Also in:
lkml
"Naveen N. Rao" [off-list ref] writes:
Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
Add and use PPC_RAW_TRAP() instead of opencoding. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/probes.h | 3 ++- arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h index 89beabf5325c..5527a955fb4a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h@@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ #define PPC_RAW_BRANCH(offset) (0x48000000 | PPC_LI(offset)) #define PPC_RAW_BL(offset) (0x48000001 | PPC_LI(offset)) +#define PPC_RAW_TW(t0, a, b) (0x7f000008 | ___PPC_RS(t0) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))Shouldn't that be 0x7c000008 ?
Yes, my script agrees. https://github.com/mpe/misc-scripts/blob/master/ppc/ppc-instruction-encode $ ./ppc-instruction-encode 0:31 6:t0 11:ra 16:rb 21:4 31: .long 0x7c000008 t0 << 21 ra << 16 rb << 11 I guess the only user is PPC_RAW_TRAP() which passes t0 = 31, so that's why nothing has broken. Send a fixup? :) cheers