Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: pci_dn: Add missing of_node_put() for of_get_xx API
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2022-07-01 22:19:52
On 7/1/22 12:47, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
On 7/1/22 06:17, Liang He wrote:quoted
In pci_add_device_node_info(), we should use of_node_put() for the reference 'parent' returned by of_get_parent() to keep refcount balance. Fixes: cca87d303c85 ("powerpc/pci: Refactor pci_dn") Co-authored-by: Miaoqian Lin [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Liang He <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c index 938ab8838ab5..aa221958007e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_add_device_node_info(struct pci_controller *hose, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->list); parent = of_get_parent(dn); pdn->parent = parent ? PCI_DN(parent) : NULL;NACK pdn->parent is now a long term reference so we should not do a put on parent until we pdn->parent is no longer valid.
I withdraw my NACK. On closer inspection pdn->parent is a reference to the parent struct pci_dn and not a reference to a parent struct device_node. Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
-Tyrelquoted
+ of_node_put(parent); if (pdn->parent) list_add_tail(&pdn->list, &pdn->parent->child_list);