Re: Regression: Linux v5.15+ does not boot on Freescale P2020
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-26 14:31:00
Also in:
lkml
Le 26/07/2022 à 10:34, Pali Rohár a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Monday 25 July 2022 16:54:16 Segher Boessenkool wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:10:09PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:quoted
On Monday 25 July 2022 16:20:49 Christophe Leroy wrote: Now I did again clean test with same Debian 10 cross compiler. $ git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git && cd linux $ git checkout v5.15 $ make mpc85xx_smp_defconfig ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnuspe- $ make vmlinux ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnuspe- $ cp -a vmlinux vmlinux.v5.15 $ git revert 9401f4e46cf6965e23738f70e149172344a01eef $ make vmlinux ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnuspe- $ cp -a vmlinux vmlinux.revert $ powerpc-linux-gnuspe-objdump -d vmlinux.revert > vmlinux.revert.dump $ powerpc-linux-gnuspe-objdump -d vmlinux.v5.15 > vmlinux.v5.15.dump $ diff -Naurp vmlinux.v5.15.dump vmlinux.revert.dump And there are: -c000c304: 7d 20 f8 29 lwarx r9,0,r31,1 +c000c304: 7d 20 f8 28 lwarx r9,0,r31 I guess it must be reproducible this issue as I'm using regular toolchain from distribution.The kernel had #define PPC_RAW_LWARX(t, a, b, eh) (0x7c000028 | ___PPC_RT(t) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b) | __PPC_EH(eh)) and #define PPC_LWARX(t, a, b, eh) stringify_in_c(.long PPC_RAW_LWARX(t, a, b, eh)) and #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 #define __PPC_EH(eh) (((eh) & 0x1) << 0) #else #define __PPC_EH(eh) 0 #endif but Christophe's 9401f4e46cf6 changed -"1: " PPC_LWARX(%0,0,%2,1) "\n\ +"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,1\n\ no longer checking CONFIG_PPC64. That appears to be the bug.Nice catch! Now I have tried to apply following change on master (without reverting anything)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simple_spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simple_spinlock.h index 7ae6aeef8464..72d3657fd2f7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simple_spinlock.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simple_spinlock.h@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) token = LOCK_TOKEN; __asm__ __volatile__( -"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,1\n\ +"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,0\n\ cmpwi 0,%0,0\n\ bne- 2f\n\ stwcx. %1,0,%2\n\@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static inline long __arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw) long tmp; __asm__ __volatile__( -"1: lwarx %0,0,%1,1\n" +"1: lwarx %0,0,%1,0\n" __DO_SIGN_EXTEND " addic. %0,%0,1\n\ ble- 2f\n"@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline long __arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw) token = WRLOCK_TOKEN; __asm__ __volatile__( -"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,1\n\ +"1: lwarx %0,0,%2,0\n\ cmpwi 0,%0,0\n\ bne- 2f\n" " stwcx. %1,0,%2\n\and with this change, objdump showed exactly same result as if I revert that problematic commit on top of master branch. I guess that simple_spinlock.h should be fixed to pass 1 to lwarx for CONFIG_PPC64 and 0 otherwise. Christophe, are you going to look at it?
Yes I will, but next week at the earliest. Christophe