Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: drop dependency on <asm/machdep.h> in archrandom.h
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-07-25 16:28:56
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:22:13PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Yury Norov [off-list ref] writes:quoted
archrandom.h includes <asm/machdep.h> to refer ppc_md. This causes circular header dependency, if generic nodemask.h includes random.h: In file included from include/linux/cred.h:16, from include/linux/seq_file.h:13, from arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h:6, from arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h:5, from include/linux/random.h:109, from include/linux/nodemask.h:97, from include/linux/list_lru.h:12, from include/linux/fs.h:13, from include/linux/compat.h:17, from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12: include/linux/sched.h:1203:9: error: unknown type name 'nodemask_t' 1203 | nodemask_t mems_allowed; | ^~~~~~~~~~ Fix it by removing <asm/machdep.h> dependency from archrandom.h Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h | 9 +-------- arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h index 9a53e29680f4..21def59ef1a6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/archrandom.h@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM -#include <asm/machdep.h> +bool __must_check arch_get_random_seed_long(unsigned long *v); static inline bool __must_check arch_get_random_long(unsigned long *v) {@@ -16,13 +16,6 @@ static inline bool __must_check arch_get_random_int(unsigned int *v) return false; } -static inline bool __must_check arch_get_random_seed_long(unsigned long *v) -{ - if (ppc_md.get_random_seed) - return ppc_md.get_random_seed(v); - - return false; -}I'd rather we didn't have to force this out of line. I think I see a different way to fix it, I'll just do some more build tests.Of course my idea didn't work :} So I'll just ack your patch for now, and maybe I can get the headers cleaned up in future to allow it to be out-of-line again.
I understand that it looks like a tradeoff - we inline a couple of small functions with the cost of uninlining an almost innocent victim. The complete solution would be probably a splitting ppc_md declaration out of asm/machdep.h. I wanted to do that, but I'm not a PPC guy, and just don't know how to split the header correctly. Anyways, thanks for the ack. Applied on bitmap-for-next. Thanks, Yury