Re: [PATCH 14/36] cpuidle: Fix rcu_idle_*() usage
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2022-06-14 16:41:27
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-perf-users, linux-pm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, linux-tegra, linux-um, lkml, rcu, sparclinux, virtualization, xen-devel
arndb.de>, ulli.kroll@googlemail.com, vgupta@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, bcain@quicinc.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dalias@libc.org, tony@atomide.com, amakhalov@vmware.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, jonas@southpole.se, yury.norov@gmail.com, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, paulmck@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, monstr@monstr.eu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, anup@brainfa ult.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" [off-list ref] On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c@@ -622,9 +622,13 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_onesh * to avoid a deep idle transition as we are about to get the * broadcast IPI right away. */ -int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void) +noinstr int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void) { +#ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H + return arch_test_bit(smp_processor_id(), cpumask_bits(tick_broadcast_force_mask)); +#else return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask); +#endif }This is somewhat not-ideal. :/
I'll say.
Could we unconditionally do the arch_test_bit() variant, with a comment, or does that not exist in some cases?
Loads of build errors ensued, which is how I ended up with this mess ...